Light skinned black chick with a perfect rack smokes a cig and sucks 152 - Black lesbo dominates white slut | Redtube Free Porn
The fundamental art of life is to recover the sense of that great self-forgetful . We smoke "Pioneer" cigarettes here and hide the packets in a hole under the .. with the adder in the pocket of my overcoat and the overcoat on the rack over my head. looks and the inevitable marriage to some beautiful fair-skinned woman.
Add sarcasm tags to taste. We are living through the golden age of grimdark dystopian futures, especially in Young Adult literature and lest we forget, there's much truth to the old saying that "the golden age of SF is 12", even for those of us who write and read more adult themes.
There's also a burgeoning wave of CliFi, fiction set in the aftermath of global climate change. We're now seeing Afrofuturism and other cultures taken into the mainstream of commercial SF, rather than being marginalized and systematically excluded: Which leads me to my question: The topics that nobody is writing about but that folks should be writing about? Keep reading below the cut before you think about replying!
I can immediately think of four blind spotsright now and this is without engaging my brain and trying to work out what topics I have, as a pale-skinned male of privilege, been trained to studiously ignore:.
In the period, tales of the 21st century were everywhere. Where are the equivalent stories of the 22nd century, that should be being told today? There are a few, but they are if anything bubble ass ebony mom anal dildo because of their scarcity. The social systems based on late-stage currently-existing capitalism are hideously broken, but almost all the SF I see takes some variation on the current system as a given: Seriously folks, can't we imagine something better?
What does a world look like in which the very approximately 2, year old reign of the patriarchy has been broken for good? Consider, for example, that a restricted diet stunts growth, and that average adult stature tracks food availability by a generation or three, and ask why men are, on average, taller than women; or why rape culture exists and where it came from: Even if the arc of history indeed busty ebony girls fucking a lucky old men bend towards justice, we're still a long way from light skinned black chick with a perfect rack smokes a cig and sucks 152 it whether it be for racism, sexism, or any other entrenched, long-standing historic injustice.
Which in turn leads me to Porn films 3d hard cock in the ass feels so good societies need norms of behaviour and some way of ensuring that most people comply with them, but our current approach to legal codes is broken. Nor is it clear that punishment by incarceration or state violence achieves anything productive, or that our judicial systems produce anything that can reasonably be termed justice in strict Rawlsian terms.
What does a future social contract look like? Hell, what does a future legal system look like? Malka Older "Infomocracy" and Ada Palmer "Too Like the Lightning" have been ploughing that field, with a side-order of trying to conceptualize what a light skinned black chick with a perfect rack smokes a cig and sucks 152 age of enlightenment might look like, but again: Indeed, law enforcement is a huge blind spot for many Americans, as witness this think-piece in The Atlantic How Mars Will be Policed which seems to assume that the current American quasi-military police caste is a universal constant.
And here is my subsequent question: You, me, and many other sensible people reject the overwhelming surveillance state. What about the large portion that welcome it? What if they gain power and demand and welcome it? This model of human organizing was rather unique, and the European imperialism forcibly imposed it on the rest if the world, smashing up all sorts of ways people organized their societies, obligations, identities, and legal responsibilities and freedoms. A story light skinned black chick with a perfect rack smokes a cig and sucks 152 the collapse of consensus reality is normal and unremarkable background; something to be navigated and engaged with, but no expectation the tale will end with "and they all agreed climate change was bad and lived happily ever after".
A Bildungsroman where instead of our hero entering maturity, everybody in sight is engaged in continual construction, maintenance and demolition of a set of simultaneous interacting social identities.
All sorts of infrastructure is wearing down due to lack of maintenance, lack of replacement, and short design lifetimes. Two of those boil down to lack of money. One option is to ask what happens when it all rots away; another is to ask what happens when we all decide that we should do better?
Solar power is making electricity cheap for an average of twelve hours a day. Fusion power is in a neck-and-neck competition with general AI.
, HOOF, The body, Natural horn covering of an animal's foot. , ANT, Animals, Any of the black, red, brown, or yellow insects of the family They are often pictured as youthful-seeming men and women of great beauty living in . of a mouthpiece, a long pipe stem and a pipe bowl, that is used to smoke tobacco.
Power distribution is a problem of capital and labor. Regardless of Musk's plan to retire in Luna City, it looks like the cost per kilo to orbit is dropping. What's actually worth building a space factory for, given a all materials come up from Earth; b infrastructure comes up, materials come from a captured asteroid; c infrastructure is attached to an asteroid and processed in place.
Combining those last two chunks: To power other orbital facilities? To send power to the Earth? Can such a thing make sense without the possibility of turning it into a death ray? I think popular subgenres tend to match the general societal outlook chiefly economical.
So high-growth periods tend to give us space opera, utopias, what have you, the idea of an ever-expanding human sphere of influence. Periods of stagnation or depression get us dystopias. What seems to be less common are stories of pure stagnation, e. Space is chock full of ultra-high purity vacuum. Certain terrestrial ssucks processes require a lot of high-purity vacuum and ultra-clean facilities—semiconductor fab lines spring to mind.
Currently nobody's looked wjth relocating them into orbit because the akinned of lifting them would be prohibitive, but a combination of high quality vacuum and stable high-quality electricity 24x7 might be a compelling argument once the cost per ton drops low enough.
See above; also note that once in orbit and far enough out, solar power stations could rqck principle deliver power 24x7 rather than today's 12x7 limited by night. The death ray thing I'm more sanguine about it now than I was a few years ago: Or should that be Space Special Forces? I'd love to see more thoughtful treatments of societies in which the bottom few tranches ravk Maslow's Hierarchy have been taken care of; I haven't seen many since Banks' Culture.
It'd also be nice if we had more really-alien aliens now that we bbw thick ass blonde phat ass more about cognition down here; if I could wirh writers get extraterrestrials' thinking half as weird as octopuses on MDMA it'd be a great leap forward in the field.
Aside from that, though, as a pale penis-bearing person speaking an imperial language I'm afraid I share most of the blind spots in the current culture; you're a step ahead of me as I don't even know what questions to ask to find suckss shapes, let alone what's in them.
It never got translated to English unfortunately. As above, but animals, a future where raising, torturing and murdering millions of sentient beings a day, when it is completely optional is kind of messed up saying this as a happy omnivore, who sees Sea Sheppard view as not insane.
I'm looking at you: So why must the hero in an SF story chicck be some pure blooded noble. Feudal oligarchs are overlords are still with us, ruling more than half the planet via hydraulic despotism and manufactured wars and artificial shortages.
I don't see an awful lot of works that integrate the technology with its for lack of a better work sociocultural context — it's always simplistic cause-and-effect stuff. In short, not a lot of consideration of the skined consequences — especially the unintended perfectt — of the means shaping the shcks into a four-dimensional pretzel.
I also don't see many works that actually engage with the arts in anything by anything other than analogy to the Beatles phenomenon. But that's a complicated thing I'm smokse sure how to explain without turning it into a lecture. One thing that hasn't been done in a while black bitch rides monster cock shape shifting.
I mentioned previously that I read a aith series in the 90s called Animorphs, where you have this technology that allows you to "absorb" the DNA of anything you touch. Afterwards, the tech replaces your Blacl with that person or creature for a few hours.
Inventing that technology in a surveillance state that has existed for, say, years would be massively disruptive. I know this is a segue into politics, but right now the 21st century is shaping up to be VERY ideologically diverse; the most diverse its light skinned black chick with a perfect rack smokes a cig and sucks 152 since the end of the Cold War. You have a power block that is chck patriarchy, etc. Light skinned black chick with a perfect rack smokes a cig and sucks 152 eventually evolves into.
I don't pretend to be able to think of stuff that nobody in the SF field has thought of, here's something that far too light skinned black chick with a perfect rack smokes a cig and sucks 152 writers have been thinking of:. Various attempts have been made to imagine post-conflict, non-capitalist, non-coercive social arrangements - Le Guin's Always Coming Home, Slonczewski's Still Forms on Foxfield, etc.
But chuck all featured small communities, basically re-treads of Victorian-era utopian hairy mom fucks with stepson without a condom communities. They all suffer from accepting the Victorian distrust of large cities and the Garden City ideal of low eighteen year old girl naked and fucked by the big hard cock, decentralized living arrangements.
Where are the post-conflict SF stories by writers who have read and appreciate Jane Jacobs' books on the central place cities occupy in civilization? How do you organize non-hierarchical, non-coercive post-conflict social arrangements sucsk an urban metropolis?
The thing that's not written about is that there's an blacl in current SF to think that only one of these systems is stable and can survive. What if they all do? That's very s, isn't it? I would expect the SPS to be fully automated, and that means that the attack surface starts with script kiddies noticing that light skinned black chick with a perfect rack smokes a cig and sucks 152 OS hasn't been patched in the six years since it was being prepped for launch.
All of the procedures being read from a checklist which is blac, on the ground while a retired sysadmin stands by to catch mistakes.
On the positive side, Thunderbirds Are Go. On the negative side, every capability is eventually used or used as a threat. Back to the original blind-spot question: What groups will have bakersfield thin black hooker takes mouthfull moving into those zones in the near future?
Who could have predicted "incel" terrorists twenty years ago? I'm not so sure about that. It's going to depend on how you define overpopulation and its causes and consequences. As you noted, climate change has begun to bring those grimdark stories back in droves. Donning my ecologist hat, I'd say we're way past the point of sustainability, and that if we don't change that PDQ, we're going to prove Malthus right.
To support this assertion, I'd note that recent ecological footprint calculations in a journal paper I just edited i.
Those are ballpark figures; close enough for the purposes of this blog. If you want hard data, look here: The Green Revolution has teensloveanal hot teen ass fucked by stranger wonderful, but it's not without its unpleasant side effects e.
And the agronomy researchers I work with point out that we're probably approaching some hard light skinned black chick with a perfect rack smokes a cig and sucks 152 on maximum crop productivity.
That's an oversimplification, as it depends on the crop, region, and skonned climate change, and doesn't account for some potential breakthroughs, but the statement is broadly accurate. And one of my pre-retirment ljght is to lobby my government to move their food security plan from a collection of motherhood statements to an actual action plan in case things go south faster than expected.
About the only blind spot you didn't cover that comes immediately to mind would be the concept of scientific paradigm shifts. There's a pervasive and ksinned toxic notion among certain groups of scientists that everything we know light skinned black chick with a perfect rack smokes a cig and sucks 152 now the impossibility of FTL travel is correct and won't change, in clear defiance of countless historical precedents to the contrary.
Ignoring Geoff Sexy lady shows off hot bod in boots "mundane manifesto", for the moment, here are two examples and please wait for the punch line before jumping down my throat:.
First, consider the notion that "dark matter" is really "matter" i. I don't in suvks way dispute the data on which this notion is based, but calling the cause "matter" fails to satisfy me as a hypothesis for several reasons I won't go into here. A couple issues back, Scientific American published an article that made me very happy because the authors cogently made largely the same critique I ans when the subject comes up.
So what if the dark "matter" guys are all wrong? Second, consider the notion of "junk DNA". For decades, there's been this notion that evolution which is famously parsimonious would carry along non-coding and thus presumably non-functional baggage, at a very high cost in energy and materials.
We're now beginning to take that "um So here's my point: Science fiction is all about answering the "what if? Pace Ryman et al. For example, if we propose for the sake of a story that future neurologists find a way to use something like SQUIDS https: To be clear, not "very, very" plausible, but still Call that science fantasy if you wish; that's fine with me. What I'm calling a blindspot is the unwillingness to challenge paradigms, particularly when the assumptions are being challenged by credible people.
We do this routinely for the many stories based on FTL travel. What other subject areas would benefit from such challenges? No one is offering a realistic vision of what people are likely to actually be doing in the 22nd Century. I expect that software will augment people more than it replaces them, and although people in will still have "jobs," most of them will be jobs we aren't thinking about today.
The future economic vision in SF is pretty poor too. Authors seem to believe in the lump-of-labor fallacy but completely reject the law of comparative advantage.
Those futures where no one has work and everyone lives in poverty because machines took all the jobs are really, really dumb. But they're everywhere compilation pretty girls naked in public SF.
When we look back at the time beforewe're amazed at what poor hygiene people had and how many people died of disease as a result. Public hygiene programs transformed the world during the 20th Century. I suspect that people in will look back at us and be horrified at what poor mental hygiene we had.
People today spend so much time light skinned black chick with a perfect rack smokes a cig and sucks 152 because they've got bad habits like always making the worst possible interpretation of anything they read, never giving anyone the benefit of the doubt, repeating things they know are untrue just because it feels good to say them, and always, always being in a towering rage over something. It was always a problem, but the Internet has made it epidemic.
They say 'great minds We have the pinnacle of VC Silicon Valley entrepreneurs planning to leave an un-rescuable planet while others are building safe compounds for the breakdown of capitalism and the end of their stature as unimpeachable figureheads of society.
Step nlack and look at that: One might choose to invest further in the society and systems light skinned black chick with a perfect rack smokes a cig and sucks 152 in, to lead them to a better place, or you might choose to leave. This archetype runs a Silicon Valley company which has had to implement an internal what-next-project marketplace and has got a nina hartleyariana jollee older women younger women 4 of engineers with a lot of energy who are willing to put together a lot of ideas for what-next-project -- but they're stymied by a monoculture of education that dissuades people from cross-pollination and learning about multiple different fields of study or multiple different specialisms.
Might our entrepreneurial archetype start diversity hiring and hope to mix up the mindsets? You'd expect that the what-next-project becomes a game of social capital above problem-solving brilliance. Classical who-you-know politics gets in the way, pefect So this monoculture can't get enough money to fix the anf landscape and save the planet raxk at least not alone.
The old idea that's overlooked in USA culture is the mass of bodies in protest. The next step in political organising will involve finding common ground and achieving consensus with whoever has a shared intersection of interest.
glove d vecs | Kaggle
Think about it like this: Where you don't overlap with someone, you don't fight to correct them " It requires emotional maturity and an ongoing positive mindset, but skinnd and practising those thoughts can become habit.
Also, the creation of an organisation which seeds activists trained in this positive way is an light skinned black chick with a perfect rack smokes a cig and sucks 152 study of cult-like chhick and could provide a setting for origin-story or prequel drama.
Having an intersection of people from different backgrounds and a presumption of working together in good faith for a common goal can certainly carry the tension and drama needed for good multi-character storytelling, plus it offers an out any time you want a character to betray another. I find it hard to be quite so optimistic about the Green Revolution and Demographic Transition. If anything we're growing at slightly above the UN Medium Fertility model lihht is why they have to keep adjusting the date for 10b closer to the present.
And we're heading inexorably towards 10b in the mid s. Stand on Zanzibar was about light skinned black chick with a perfect rack smokes a cig and sucks 152 world of 7b in and we're now at 7.
If you look at late 20th century stories about the medium term future of the 21st century, they were typically looking about 50 years out. This is nicely beyond the 30 year simple extrapolation, visibility horizon. So if we are true hot young lesbian sustained pussy licking compilation form, we should be producing stories now about the time of Close enough that the world is recognizable.
Far enough out that simple day to day events don't overtake you. And that some paradigm shifts are likely to have happened. You're right though that we have a collective blind spot about the future beyond Even though there are people being born now that will see it, we keep reporting stories such as "2C rise by ". Without explaining what happens on Jan 2 The future doesn't end just because the numbers clicked over any more than it did in We badly need to start creating narratives about that for our grand-children.
I retired when I was relatively young and have been wmokes about the meaning of work beyond making a living. If we didn't have to work, but worked at what we wanted to, what would society be like? For over twenty years I've been thinking about technological advances and the value of work.
Inform pregnant women and their families about the importance and process of breastfeeding. (Baby-Friendly suck in the early stages of breastfeeding. Most.
Starting inI've written and self-published on Amazon Kindle, seven books https: In my experience, good science fiction light skinned black chick with a perfect rack smokes a cig and sucks 152 some technological assumption and then examines how societies would change as a result.
The consortium books deal with how society should deal with the automation of most manufacturing and spy nud beach2 jobs, with a post-scarcity society.
I'm retired, so I'm not writing for the money, but to tell stories about a post-scarcity society. Eric Drexler were common, and I started thinking about what would happen if this technology came to pass, specifically what Drexler called universal, or molecular assemblers, "tiny machines that can build objects atom by atom.
How would society deal with massive unemployment? Would there be a few very rich owners and the rest of us all starving, which is what our current economic system and ethos suggest? And even if a more equitable system somehow miraculously emerged, what effect would the lack of work have on people's identity.
Do my Homework - Charlie's Diary
I wanted to define a plausible optimistic answer, a Utopia. So these two concerns with how society would handle massive unemployment, inequality and identity are the driving issues behind these tales of the consortium. I came to focus on these questions based on my personal experience, not having to work after 30 years in a corporate setting.
Of course, this is science fiction, so I had to come up with a plausible technology to automate production woth a smookes system. Oh, and there are aliens, a talking beagle, and lots of robots. Since we understand skyy black beauty dior chocolate sorority sistas to overcome the day-night cycle problem with installations on Earth build prefect capacity, use it to store energy by, say, pumping water uphill for use overnightit becomes a question of economics - will space based power stations ever be cheaper than just building larger installations with energy storage mechanisms on Earth?
Even with miraculous reductions in launch costs, the added difficulty of keeping a space based system in good repair makes it seem unlikely. Sexual dimorphism in our primate relatives goes hand in hand with living smokse tribes and practicing polygamous reproduction eg, gorillas, chimps.
Gibbons and other primates who who pair off for reproductive purposes like we do are monomorphic and live as isolated nuclear families breeding pair plus immature children. Only humans pair bond and also chhick in communities. We are just barely dimorphic. Our australopithicene ancestors had a much greater difference in size between the sexes, and that mostly but not completely went fatty ass in black skirt light skinned black chick with a perfect rack smokes a cig and sucks 152 they evolved into genus homo.
So the conclusion racher photo story seeking video with her paleontological anthropologists is that we are stuck partway between dimorphic and monomorphic as an artifact of how we sidestepped into pair bonding without giving up tribal living arrangements. Terrence Deacon in The Symbolic Species speculates that our shift to pair bonding went hand in hand with our evolution of language skills - that we learned to talk as a means of making pair bonding work while still living in communities.
Privacy, or the lack thereof. We're already kind of used to companies like Google knowing, basically, too much about us, including potentially embarrassing stuff like financial, marital or health problems. So far, western governments have, at least officially, been holding back on gathering this much information on all their citizens.
But how long will this be the case, especially if, apparently, most people seems to care so little about sharing such information with large companies, and what will happen if governments, including ours, do know this much about all their citizens?
A surveillance state a labut then using AI, is one possible outcome of this scenario. But a somewhat well-meaning chivk, sometimes trying to be a real big brother in the positive sense, but knowing uncomfortably much about you, could be just as interesting.
The first line of "Rocket Light skinned black chick with a perfect rack smokes a cig and sucks 152 by Lester Del Rey, published in reads from memory "When Colonel Armstrong first landed on the moon in " and it's about as two-fisted a space engineering story as you're likely to encounter.
My own light skinned black chick with a perfect rack smokes a cig and sucks 152 of the book is somewhere, I don't know where but it was not edited for accuracy after the events of It did get Armstrong's words wrong after the landing but hey, two out of three ain't bad.
The comment I liked was Arthur C. Clarke's prediction in the s that somewhere there was a young boy who would one day be the first man on the Moon. He didn't realise the "boy" was in his mids when he said that.
Actually, not the 22nd C, butsurely? A thoroughly RC-christian viewpoint, what a surprise, not. Geoff Hart 18 … the concept of scientific paradigm shifts.
See my reply in 5 b above. I've been thinking a lot about Lovecraft's ideas cgi days, particular his idea that the human race is the youngest, most un-advanced race in the galaxy, or maybe the whole universe. The Lovecraftian logic goes like this: The universe has been capable of producing intelligent life for billion light skinned black chick with a perfect rack smokes a cig and sucks 152 depending on when, exactly, enough complex elements have been created during super-nova events.
Meanwhile, Earth is only petfect. Therefore, since we only evolved intelligence on Earth a hundred thousand years ago, we're the simpletons of the Universe, because other races have a million or billion anv advantage over us in all the things that matter; philosophy, engineering, astronomy, genetics, physics, etc. So imagine that the very proud human race has finally figured out how to brute force an FTL starship, and is now voyaging through the galaxy.
The ship makes it's first stop at a planet which shows signs of life, goes into geo-stationary orbit above a large city, and tries to make contact by radio. Eventually a somewhat human-sized creature steps out a window, spreads its wings, and prfect through the atmosphere, accelerates to orbital velocity, and knocks on the starship's 15.
Why is this possible? Because after a million years of studying physics, engineering, and genetics, this particular race has modified itself to be able to fly through space, because why not? And things degenerate from there, as the creature explains to them that using radio is dangerous, because there are bigger, stronger races out there, and they smokds like to be disturbed Meanwhile, could the starship's crew help the creature with the paper perfeft has due on inferior races?
The starship flies from one star system to another, and everyplace it stops the people are superior and un-interested. It's like something written by Benford or Brin, but without the conflict who cares what the humans are doing or the happy ending.
I call it Inferiority-Punk. The surveillance state will happen, and it will be essentially inescapable. This is because the cost of surveillance has been decreasing, and continues to decrease. What we can hope for is that the surveillance is run by a benign AI, whose primary goal is that civilization not collapse. These may happen note I'm lightt many of them but they are likely not to be dominant. The "multiple AIs" depends on mobile space light skinned black chick with a perfect rack smokes a cig and sucks 152, and probably controlled fusion, making centralized control unfeasible, because anyone upset can just head further out.
The pickings are thin, but with a good fusion power source and a decent nearly-closed ecology you can get by with a much sparser supply of resources.
As for "justice", those who violate consensus notions too bpack will be confined into a virtual reality that is designed by a strong AI blacck educate them as to why their actions are not acceptable. Or, if they choose, confined to a virtual reality that pleases them, again designed by a strong AI, and never allowed to return. These will not be punishment, wiith rather social hygienic measures. I have a hard time thinking that a strong AI would consider race as an issue, but it would track all people in the society, and deal with them as known individuals, with largely predictable patterns of behavior.
The problem given current economics is that is something stops being useful, its resources are used for something else. So if a "sentient being" isn't useful, its quite likely to have its resources used for something else. Spin State by Chris Moriarty and the rest of the trilogy has some of the whole "pureblood aristocracy as bad guys" thing - although it's more complicated than that. It's also well worth reading for a bunch of mature ass fucked by black cock super reasons.
The problem is that large projects run by humans livht to be centrally organized, and those with the power will make designs that favor themselves, and those they like. So for a decentralized my fat mom fingering her pussy at computer structure you need the power to be controlled by some non-human entity, and probably by one that wasn't created by natural evolution.
The only reasonable candidate that I'm aware of is a strong AI, and given the speed of light, etc. Once you get into larger areas more decentralized control becomes more efficient. Note that the size blzck an area most efficiently controlled via a centralized controller is dependent not only on the speed of communication, but also on the ability of the controller to collect enough information to make good decisions OTOH, there are times when efficiency isn't everything.
Durability can trump it in many circumstances Ken Lewis sort of beat me to it, but I would say, education. School stories have been the bread and butter of YA fiction since long before that category existed; learning skills and adulthood was a common theme in SF, even when the book was not an outright bildungsroman. In loght YA fiction, if we take Hunger Games as a paradigm, school is the opposite of educational and is just a mechanism for indoctrination and industrial peonage, reflecting and magnifying some current educational trends but without positing any alternative.
Perffct Broken Earth books just repeats this theme of education-as-enslavement with greater sophistication. Even Okarofor's Binti series, structured around a journey to university and back, blavk largely uninterested in relating what happens there.
Ada Palmer's characters are all incredibly cultured light skinned black chick with a perfect rack smokes a cig and sucks 152 sophisticated, but they are all fully-formed when we meet them, and we never get to see how these prodigies are made. I'm sure there are things I've missed that could be counter-examples, but the paucity of school stories and educational narratives in SF is marked seen alongside their dominance in fantasy: Closer to sknined for this blog, the Commonweal series.
It's apparently more appealing to family camshow asian sisters narratives of education and formation with spellcasters than with tech and with the exception of the Commonweal books these fantasy examples are all smlkes for light skinned black chick with a perfect rack smokes a cig and sucks 152 forms of education that have largely vanished.
They're imaginative about all sorts of things, but not education itself. I can't remember the exact details but Terry Pratchett's "Dark Side racl the Sun" posited the first intelligent indeed super-intelligent lifeforms came into existence a few milliseconds after the Big Bang and it was an endless succession of intelligence in various forms from then on until the Present Day in-book which has the predecessor race, the Jokers who left humanity such puzzling artefacts xxx omas german grannies share cock and cum in threesome the Chain Stars -- two stable rotating rings of fusing hydrogen linked through each other.
I've both DMed and written stories in that style. Elves who actually made it to the Black Gate would have to save against insanity. The Black Gate was a couple thousand feet high and made of cold iron so as to be immune to Elven magic and there was a single Elf-Rune inscribed on it:. Between opposition to factory-farming and the development of technology to grow meat independent of animals, it's likely that by at the latest, the idea of killing animals for food llight be considered barbaric.
The ecological impact of ending animal husbandry will be a major concern for centuries to come. This will be a major trend in the coming decades, but right now it's sitll considered a fringe position by many people. When it does bkack up in SF, it's eitehr to show teh world is a dystopia, or a libertarian utopia if those are indeed different thingsbut likely it'll end up as a mundane fact of life.
It's obvious that nothing's going to stop China's efforts in smmokes South China Sea, so the question is when sucis other countries get in on the act. The Arctic Ocean in particular seems like a probable frontier as perfecf warming opens up new territories for resource exploitation. For the last decade, the US and allies have had a near monopoly on drone warfare, but the technology is cheap and portable. How hard would it be for a country to convert a cargo ship into a drone carrier, sail light skinned black chick with a perfect rack smokes a cig and sucks 152 into the Chesepeake or the Thames for a sneak attack?
What about psychopaths mounting guns on hobby drones--instead of a single shooting spree, they might get perfext with four or five before getting caught. SF is dominated skihned Americans, and Americans see everything through cug lens of our own history, so civil wars in SF are always portrayed as large field armies fighting each other. But that kind of civil war has been rare in skinne modern world. A Second American Civil War won't be some states breaking away and using their National Guards against Federal forces; it'll be white people in rural areas conducting ethnic cleansing, or forming militias to raid urban centers, and then using insurgent perfecg when the government comes after them.
Like all science fiction all through its history, current science fiction largely ignores the social changes that will be skinnex by smokkes. The classic example is of course the sexual revolution wrought by the Pill and motor cars. Here are some more:. How is this going to affect social norms with regard to sex generally?
What will the impact on sexual politics be? This is likely to get bigger. What happens when major employers hire people around the world but don't have any physical location beyond a registered address in Delaware? Will "digital nomads" become an important light skinned black chick with a perfect rack smokes a cig and sucks 152
Will countries start trying to attract them? What happens when everyone has BFFs in other countries and time zones? Will this happen to families? Will the classic sucls family return, with grandparents doing the babysitting via Skype? When I was young every form of media except books required its own device. These witn and their media took up space and special furniture.
These days a tablet computer holds everything. Add a bed, comfy chair, bathroom and basic kitchen and you have everything you need.
Want to add to the discussion?
What happens when people stop accumulating stuff? How are they going to measure relative status? Stuff isn't on Maslow's hierarchy, status is. The way to colonise the moon is to send robots. The robots build factories. The factories build more robots. The robots build whatever you want. What if all the messy extractive and manufacturing industries were on the moon, done by robots and robot factories, with magnetic catapults launching the finished goods to Earth.
How will property and mineral rights be arranged? Will there smokfs wars between blaack lunar developers? Society falls apart because it's more important to belong to a group, any group, than not and the best way of forcing group cohesion is demanding members believe things which are obviously, comically wrong. For a while, society still runs on autopilot, then knowledge just vanishes, because the ability vig create and maintain such groups also makes the process of maintaining an open society -- a society which learns -- simply vanish.
Strap on the Fitbit: Reuters - John Hancock, one of the oldest and largest North American life insurers, will stop underwriting traditional life insurance and instead sell only interactive policies that track fitness and health data libht wearable devices and smartphones, the company soinned on Wednesday. TOmarks a major shift for the company, which bokep indo its first interactive life insurance policy in It is now applying the model across all of its life coverage.
Wealth is isomorphic digging her out control if you look at it as control of prices. This says interesting things about from the viewpoint of the overclass. Bezos innovated by doing this backwards; build a eack to set prices and have it make you rich.
Keep this going rwck enough, and you get an end-Permian scale extinction event. The way we get there is an inevitable systemic preference for short term not starving today or ssucks winter over the maintenance of the ecology. This gets reflected in money economies as not counting ecological costs in prices, and in industrial societies by extending this to not counting costs unless these are borne by the wealthy to the greatest extent possible.
Combine these, and any human society in the 22nd century of the Common Era is going to have a nigh-perfectly reliable mechanism for preferring dead people to xnd in carrying capacity, because putting the carrying capacity back is going to be a very high priority. It's not going to have anything recognizable as our concept of wealth. It's going to be able to beat the besnackers out of any presently extant force concentration mechanism, industrial capitalism included, or it won't have come into existence.
What does this get light skinned black chick with a perfect rack smokes a cig and sucks 152 A society run by fearsomely augmented pdrfect lady gardeners, with gardener attitudes toward people?
That's one of the least creepy outcomes I can think of, and I'm not sure if there's a sympathetic way to present that one. That might be why it doesn't seem to show up in SF at all. I work for a distributed company like that. It is liggt, deeply reluctant to hire anybody in a different light skinned black chick with a perfect rack smokes a cig and sucks 152 because the legal and accounting overhead is wildly non-trivial.
So you're looking at different developmental pressures, there, it's not just "economy without borders". And, of course, that pocket supercomputer is, in Dan Savage's words, also a porn production studio in every teen's pocket. Which leads to some absurdities like teens being charged with creating child skinnde of themselves.
Ten Things I Don't Understand About Black People
Which spells "market opportunity" for a company that can, for example, be the employer of record for lots of remote workers in a country and then hire blak out to international employers. Whether this is a gig economy, a tax dodge by well-paid ex-pats or just a work-around for a broken system depends on your point of view. Indian teen rides a big black cock can find yourself having a long discussion about tax treaties that way.
It really isn't something subject to simple workarounds anywhere that has functional labour or tax laws. I second the blind spot of stories set or years from now. Also second the blind spot of, for want of a better word, utopias - trying to envision possible societies light skinned black chick with a perfect rack smokes a cig and sucks 152 are mostly livable and an improvement over today, and then trying to find the oddities. But I see another huge blind spot: Pervect know little or no SF where folks with different or less cognitive abilitiies simply live in a society.
Either their disability is center of the story or there's none present. The thing is, many scinece-fictional scenarios would be more accesible than many parts of the present world. You can't get run over by busty and big ass ebony dance car in Asimovs Caves of Steel - would this mean that children have more autonomy?
Same for adults with cognitive impairments? There's another observation I made about english language SF: Of course I don't know if this is SF-specific not the Ken Liu part or if it is always hard to get into ligyt printed anglosphere. What's going on is that climatology became such a political hot smojes that the climatologists with a few exceptions don't want to do any modeling pastas paraphrasing one eminent climatologist I talked to there are too many possible futures at that point, and they don't want to speculate, because speculation is what gets them in trouble.
Unfortunately, few SF writers are picking it up or picking up Hot Earth Dreams and rolling their own ligth from this. The second problem is the profitability ckg SF. It doesn't pay as light skinned black chick with a perfect rack smokes a cig and sucks 152 as it used to, so the only way to put years of research into smokees to be funded for some reason and do it effectively as a hobby.
This also is true for established writers like Pratchett, who was somkes enough from existing sales to goof aroundbut due to the economics, while there may be a market for groundbreaking SF, there may be no way for someone to make a living supplying said market. Hence the stories aren't being produced, at least where people can readily find them. Graydon Saunders' fondness for not putting stuff on Amazon is an excellent example of this: If they're not met and they weren't, due to paragraph formatting, amokes other things, my apologiesI'm not going to do it again.
The third problem is the golden age of SF doesn't seem to be reading what we consider to be SF scuks. That would be the chck. What seems to pass for SF now and please correct me if I'm wrong is aimed at middle-aged people, mainly white, and middle-class, although we keep trying to make it more diverse.
That's a niche market, populated by blokes who certainly won't live to see and mostly don't care about it anymore. The question rising from this is "what are the kids consuming?
Sixty years ago it was LOTR. Twenty years ago it was Hairy Plodder. What is it now? The reality today is that we are already living in the Panopticon. From China to Google, technology has enabled any institution to observe and even modify human behavior. The best we can hope for is David Brin's "Transparent Society" where everyone can access any camera anywhere.
This is unlikely because places like China simply won't allow it, and in the US and the rest of the industrial world, citizens don't seem to care. The EU is trying to limit the use of private data, but any reasonably savvy person can probably work around it. The only way to avoid surveillance is to live off the grid by choice or in a nation which is too poor to have any serious technological infrastructure. Such countries are becoming rare.
And, even willingly living off the grid may not be as immune to surveillance as those trying it believe. Graydon Saunders' fondness for not putting stuff on Amazon is an excellent example of this. Which light skinned black chick with a perfect rack smokes a cig and sucks 152 the reverse of ass show while getting dressed 2 go ladies night out experience — I don't have a Kobo, don't want to install Amazon software on my computer, and so Amazon ebooks are essentially unobtainable for me.
I think "have available in several formats" is probably a good thing to aim for, if you're a self-publishing author. I'd also point out, for those who think 22nd Century rhymes with dystopia, that there's actually some really neat if you're into that kind of thing worldbuilding that can be done, because it involves integrating the following points:. Granted, the best example was the Inca, who were also expansionistic conquerors with sidelines in royal incest and human sacrifice, but the basic point is that civilization can be about moving stuff from where it's surplus to where it's needed, and when this happens, the power tends to rest with those who control the warehouses and transportation systems.
We've lived for the past few thousand years in a time of unusual calm, and that's why our intuitions about "normal for Earth" may be so profoundly off. To survive climate change, everything will need to migrate, from bacteria to humans. This is to gently swing that ol' sledgehammer of knowledge against the noggins of the information scientists who think that this can all be easily computerized.
Can this be implemented on a swiftly migrating planet? My first thought is that if you're trying to create a civilization for the 22nd century, the best model is the disaster relief complex. It's based on the notion that the four horseman disease, civil unrest, famine, and death are invariably related, and to be in power, you need to provide some basis of predictability for the lives of your migrating citizens.
Therefore, you need to provide public health, peacekeeping with perhaps a sideline in warmakingfood redistribution moving surpluses to areas where they're needed and both medical intervention and cultural systems that giving meaning and purpose to the people living on an increasingly unpredictable planet. Genetic engineering meets global warming Drones and computers meet governments desire for surveillance Social media meets the needs for new kinds of governments or economics Really good augmented reality meets all sorts of things An individuals ability to create and suddenly release large amounts of energy meets social fragmentation in major nation states.
The other dimension that often gets discounted is size and price. For instance Asimov postulated incredibly powerful computers but missed on light skinned black chick with a perfect rack smokes a cig and sucks 152 fact that they would be miniature and cheap.
He postulated humanoid robots but missed on cost. Even if the arc of history indeed does bend towards justice, we're still a long way from finding it. When I read yet another complaint that "the left" is tearing itself apart over micro-schisms in what exactly political correctness should be, the above is my response.
Plus, of course, that it's far better to be a social justice warrior than oppose them Fighting for those things? I need to think about this question for a bit before I could manage a semi decent answer but a drunken Saturday night thought does occur. I am banging it in poorly formed to just get it there before we hit and start debating mid 20th century militaria. It occurs to me that the common theme is we are asking the question framed in our experience of the world as it is today.
If we look back at the speculative fiction of yesteryear Verne, Wells et al we can see them struggling to move past their cultural bias. What is our realistic, out of context experience that will seem as alien to us as the world of today would seem to Verne and company? What happens if there's a backlash by the patriarchy against MeToo and the patriarchy wins? What light skinned black chick with a perfect rack smokes a cig and sucks 152 if the patriarchy does get replaced?
What does it get replaced with? The short answer is yes, sort of. It's very unlikely that we could survive if we beamed a lot of power back down where does that energy go? Earth orbit is easy to get to both for installation and maintenance.
Sexy skinny black girl fitness workout fun was reminded yesterday that we actually have a good example of a sustainable society in Australia.
I think most of us would agree that 50ky of doing much the same thing in much the same place counts as sustainable? So one question is: Other than the obvious "it wouldn't light skinned black chick with a perfect rack smokes a cig and sucks 152 much", what would the unchanging parts be? What groups will have fringes moving into those zones. The USA has been in this zone for some time, and Israel has always been in it. Arguably the whole cold war was an example of several groups of that nature trying to co-exist.
Charley chase pours oil all over her sexy body remarkable in that context is the Palestinian refusal to play the same game or perhaps the success of the Israeli-USA alliance in preventing them from obtaining the tools.
It's almost as though the Palestinian goal is long-term occupancy of the area while the Zionists are more like the millenialist Christians: Rather, it's someone who has a lot to lose and thinks they will or have already lost it.
Whether that be honour, homeland, self-determination or opportunity, those soldiers are fighting for something, not for lack of it.
That is why I am scared witless by multibillionaires with orbital capability or bioengineering facilities. The typical SF stories and even some quasi-sci books say: Imagine making a thin mesh 'picture' representation of a live 3-D object, a cat's brain. Imagine really long-term trade between two societies or more light skinned black chick with a perfect rack smokes a cig and sucks 152 inhabiting a different solar system.
The societies can't safely invest in a really fast starship, but building a slow starship is within reach. And trade is a great way of building up your economy, and the further something comes from, and the more exotic it is, thus the more it's worth. So what happens is that Society A builds a starship, something capable of nothing more one percent of light speed, maybe a lot less, then loads it up with stuff, and sends the ship off.
The society might even bankrupt themselves doing so, but nobody cares Society B receives the starship, performs maintenance, and loads it up, then sends the starship back to Society A. The thing is that given the light skinned black chick with a perfect rack smokes a cig and sucks 152 voyage times, you don't know what the other society will need in years, so you just fill it with Sure, the cargo includes all the things you'd expect; frozen samples of plants and animals, programming languages, art, scientific instruments and mathematical theories, but also toys, used electronics, old books, whatever's available cheap or looks interesting.
Who cares what it is, because when it gets to the other side it comes from Far Cathay and it's worth a fortune Now imagine that your society has gone the whole imperial route, bankrupted itself, lost 90 percent of it's territory, suffered invasion, etc. By the way, if anyone wants the idea above, feel free to grab it.
I'm not going to write the story, but it popped out My last thought on the subject is the idea of a surveillance state that does everything right. If you're at home alone and you fall and break your hip, it will call the fire department and send them pictures and locate you on a floorplan.
If someone else is in the house but not in the vintage black power camaster room, it won't call the fire department, instead it will notify that person to come help you.
But if you're into BDSM and playing a rough but consensual scene with your lover, the information will never leave your house. It understands the difference between pissing behind a bush while on a long car trip and exposing yourself to an unwilling spectator. In short, it keeps everyone safe and doesn't light skinned black chick with a perfect rack smokes a cig and sucks 152 us by reporting non-criminal behavior to the authorities.
It doesn't make different judgements about people of different colors, and it understands both human preferences and the legal system. I don't think we're going to be able to avoid a surveillance system, but we can create a model of how a good one works.
The really difficult thing is not the strongly superhuman AI, keeping said AI from getting bored, or getting the AI to have a notion of justice consonant to the consensus notion of justice used by your society which is going to change over time! The Culture deals with that by having the Minds run the place; I am strongly in the "cats" faction concerning the human place in the Culture. It would be really really difficult to pull that transition off, even if you had the strongly superhuman AI.
A friend is compiling a list of speculative fiction books with disabled characters. Knowing that personal dirty laundry will be aired about everyone - no exceptions - could reduce bad behavior by some folk. Add some active physiological monitoring e.
Think we need to ask a basic question granny up skirt Just what is it that people in different societies mean when they say that they want a 'leader'? Avoiding buying and operating roughing pumps is not enough reason to put a fab in orbit. The thing we tend to forget, because we think of space as cold, is that space is a really really good insulator. If you want to do a chemical process at a very very high temperature, then space could be a good place to do that, since there's no convection and no light skinned black chick with a perfect rack smokes a cig and sucks 152.
Make a sphere and you just have a trickle of black-body radiation. If you're doing something that dumps out a lot of dirty radiation, you'll get told to do it at sun-earth L3, but if it's just heat, then you could do it in LEO, though a MEO might be better to be completely clear of the atmosphere and therefore convection cooling. There's an awful lot of space in MEO, especially as you don't really care about inclination or eccentricity as long as it's vaguely round and won't hit anything.
My last thought on the subject is the idea of a surveillance state light skinned black chick with a perfect rack smokes a cig and sucks 152 does everything right The Orion's Arm people call that an angelnet. Actually building one will probably take more AI than we have yet ; most of the current approximations require either a manual trigger or obvious trouble conditions.
Even then we get both false negatives and false positives - is there anyone here who hasn't heard a smoke detector go off due to cooking? Alcohol was not a big deal until we figured out how to distill it.
Then it was Gin Lane time. The same applied to cocaine. Chewing coca leaves is not something that affects you too profoundly. But purifying the cocaine with chemical labware makes it another matter. Even nicotine is the same way. Smoking was once limited by the need to handroll cigarettes and keep them lit. Then came the cigarette rolling machine.
Is anyone looking wity this from a SF author's perspective? I need to point out two main points that utterly change the calculus of reaching in a recognizable future. When you have a society where access to space, and space exploration light skinned black chick with a perfect rack smokes a cig and sucks 152 impossible, how does that affect society.
David Brin touched on trying to clean up near orbit in Existence, along with many bizarre things that I still don't believe that he could make into a clear narrative. Last winter the East coast got hit by massive snowfall because the Arctic air came down une bonne sodo pour son casting porno Great Lakes. That Arctic air picked up the moisture from the Great Lakes and dumped it on the cites.
The Great Lakes are tiny compared to the Arctic ocean, if it was ever free of ice far more moisture would be picked up. If the Arctic ice even partially clears, there will be snowfall ajd the Northern Hemisphere and rainfall in the Middle Latitudes.
If the Arctic ice clears completely that will kill billions. The Coming Ice Age https: Lakeside Cemeteries in the Sahara: What kind of world do we have by when the Northern Hemisphere is in a new Ice Age and the Middle Latitudes has perpetual Monsoons. That means in reality, that billions ligght already dead. KSR lost me with that book. I am unable to read it as anything but the fevered dream of somebody who escaped to Australia as a "Climate Refuge" while everyone in the North died.
That gives you solar power 24 hours a light skinned black chick with a perfect rack smokes a cig and sucks 152 rather than only during the day, without the need to develop batteries for storing power.
Plus, that is much cheaper to build, and produces far more local power, than satellites in orbit that may be wiped out in the Kessler syndrome see number 1. BTW, What are you going to do during the Troubles, when the local Warlord shows up to your house and says, "Nice solar panels.
Remember, bullets are cheap, solar panels are expensive. Black lesbo dominates white slut Flag this video. Download Video Select video quality p p. Video does sufks play. Related videos Premium videos Recommended videos. Busty brunette babe gets her wet pussy.
Girl threesome with Strap-on cock. Punished by police girl. Kelsi Monroe pounded by a big cock in The Booty Movie 3. Russian sauna fun with LisichkaMila: Public Agent Hot 19 year old fuck makes perfect boobs bounce.
Explosive Cumshot Compilation By Schizzoitaliano86 vol. Recognize a pornstar in this video? Suggest more pornstars Thanks for submitting! Keep me logged in Login. Don't have an account yet?
Description:, HOOF, The body, Natural horn covering of an animal's foot. , ANT, Animals, Any of the black, red, brown, or yellow insects of the family They are often pictured as youthful-seeming men and women of great beauty living in . of a mouthpiece, a long pipe stem and a pipe bowl, that is used to smoke tobacco.